October 18, 2017, 10:56 pm
I love this extension and as other have said, I too find it's price a bit steep, even if I understand the move.
But my biggest issue if I buy it would be the license being tied to the domain login.
I work with 2 domains, with different logins in both, and I'm pretty sure my company will not buy the license double because of that.
And if I buy the license personally, I don't want it to be tied to 1 of my logins only and especially not "give" it to my employer.
So I guess I'll still use the community, but feel sorry to see it that crippled. |
↧
October 19, 2017, 12:41 pm
This is urgent.
I only bought this tool so I could edit NVARCHAR(MAX) columns with large amounts of text (SQL scripts).![Crying]() Please fix and patch ASAP, or I want my money back.
Is there any temporary workaround available immediately?
Grrrrrrrr.![Cursing]() |
↧
↧
October 20, 2017, 12:33 am
After searching, the problem doesn't come from Ssmsboost but from Ssms.
I'm using Sql Server 2005, and since version 17.3 there is a problem with. (For more information)
If I use a newer Sql Server with Ssmsboost the location of objects works. |
↧
October 20, 2017, 10:06 am
I use this auto replace typing "cora" when creating a new stored procedure so that it creates the procedure if it doesn't exist and alters it if it does.
Code:IF OBJECT_ID('<object name, sysname, dbo. >') IS NULL -- Check if SP Exists
EXEC('CREATE PROCEDURE <object name, sysname, dbo. > AS SET NOCOUNT ON;')
GO
ALTER PROCEDURE <object name, sysname, dbo. > -- Alter the SP Always
--PARAMETERS HERE
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON
END
GO
|
↧
October 20, 2017, 10:09 am
Create an auto replace for "lastyear"
|
↧
↧
October 20, 2017, 10:12 am
Code:MERGE <targettable, sysname, table> AS TARGET
USING <sourcetable, sysname, table> AS SOURCE
ON (
TARGET.<targetjoin, sysname, column> = SOURCE.<sourcejoin, sysname, column>
)
--WHEN MATCHED THEN (OPTIONAL 'AND' STATEMENT BEFORE 'THEN' TO PROVIDE ACTION CRITERIA)
---------------------------------------------------------
--MATCHED ACTION GOES HERE
---------------------------------------------------------
--WHEN NOT MATCHED BY TARGET THEN (OPTIONAL 'AND' STATEMENT BEFORE 'THEN' TO PROVIDE ACTION CRITERIA)
---------------------------------------------------------
--MATCHED ACTION GOES HERE
---------------------------------------------------------
--WHEN NOT MATCHED BY SOURCE THEN (OPTIONAL 'AND' STATEMENT BEFORE 'THEN' TO PROVIDE ACTION CRITERIA)
---------------------------------------------------------
--MATCHED ACTION GOES HERE
---------------------------------------------------------
-- OUTUPUT SECTION
--$action specifies a column of type nvarchar(10)
--in the OUTPUT clause that returns one of three
--values for each row: 'INSERT', 'UPDATE', or 'DELETE',
--according to the action that was performed on that row
OUTPUT $action
--,inserted.-- COLUMN OF CHANGED DATA
--inserted.-- COLUMN OF CHANGED DATA
|
![Go to last post]( "Go to last post") |
↧
October 20, 2017, 10:19 am
I use this to keep my procedural code clean.
If someone has any ideas on making this cleaner, feel free to post a refinement below.
Code:-- ********************************** Step # *************************************--
/* ******************************* Description ***********************************--
*******************************************************************************-- */
|
↧
October 20, 2017, 10:24 am
Code:update <tablename, sysname, table> set <columnname, sysname, column> = '#' where <condition, sysname, 1=1>
|
↧
October 20, 2017, 10:32 am
Code:-- ******************************* Script Information ***************************--
-- ******************************************************************************--
-- ******************************************************************************--
--
-- ** Name: <Script Name,sysname,Name>
-- ** Description: <Description,sysname,Description>
-- ** By: <User Name,sysname,{User}>
-- ** Date: {Timestamp:MM-dd-yyyy}
-- ** Database: {Database}
-- ** Server: {Server}
-- ** Modified: {Timestamp:MM-dd-yyyy}
-- ********************************** Notes *************************************--
/*
*/
-- ******************************************************************************--
-- ******************************************************************************--
-- ********************************** Start *************************************--
#
|
↧
↧
October 23, 2017, 10:37 am
Like many others, I'll be uninstalling SSMSBoost after using it daily for around 3 years. Sure the developers want to be paid for their work and I totally understand that, but the fact of the matter is, this is a plug-in and no one in their right mind is going to pay $170 US for that. Sure, $20, $30 maybe even $40.
Goodbye forever Solutions Crew, good luck with the extortion effort. |
↧
October 24, 2017, 7:10 am
I am in the UK and trying to purchase a couple of Pro licences. A UK VAT code is 9 digits long but when entered in the VATID field the site says "Specified VAT ID does not match the country you have selected."
Can you fix this. |
↧
October 25, 2017, 5:10 am
Thank you for reporting and figuring out.
I have edited a head post title a bit.
If Microsoft is not supporting SQL 2005 fully in SSMS 17.3 anymore maybe it is reasonable to stay with SSMS 2008R2 working with SQL 2005. SSMS 2008R2 is the fastest SSMS and we are still supporting it. SSMS 2012/14 are also great and are also supported by SSMSBoost. Maybe it is reasonable to stay with that versions if you cannot upgrade your SQL Server... |
↧
October 25, 2017, 6:33 am
↧
↧
October 25, 2017, 12:35 pm
I am hearing the sound of crickets chirping in the night. ![Mad]() Please indicate availability date or provide a usable workaround ASAP. |
↧
October 25, 2017, 9:21 pm
I totally agree with other guys that $0 useless version or $150 for a very useful but not a live saving tool is a tough choice.
I am writing as one of the people who has bought or otherwise (financially) supported a number of apps/tools that I regularly use, even though they also offer their software as freeware. They differ from SSMS Boost offering in that they offer a version at sub $50 price range.
Maybe you can take a cue from WinRar model.
|
↧
October 26, 2017, 3:12 am
Hi there.
Just would like to report this. The functionality works, but for some reason (this doesn't happen all the time - i haven't figured out the pattern yet) it gives an error of "Connection could not be set. Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation."
(This is when i use "R-Click > Set as Active Connection" in the Object Explorer or the Registered Servers windows.)
If there are any log files of sorts that might help you investigate this, please let me know.
Since the functionality works, it's not critical, but it is distracting and makes me double check whether or not it set the connection.
I think this might be happening when the cursor focus tries to change back to the text editor after i assign the connection... because i believe every time i saw this error, i had to go click on the text editor first to check whether or not the connection did really change. |
↧
October 26, 2017, 6:12 am
| Looks like it happens when i connect to SQL 2008 and 2012 instances, but with SQL 2005 instances it doesn't give the error. (In case this makes a difference in the bug search) |
↧
↧
October 26, 2017, 12:51 pm
| After using this great tool, and telling all of my fellow data-management friends about it, I was sad to see what looked like a bug, turn out to be a "surprise" functionality change. I think the forum has pretty much told you the price that the market is willing to bear here. It sounds like many of us would just pay $50 immediately. $150 is, put simply: unreasonable. I'll use the one, well known free tool that has almost every feature that SSMS boost has (that I care about), and I won't feel much of a difference. Please do communicate with your user-base if you decide to re-think your pricing/licensing model, you're likely to "win back" some customers. |
↧
October 27, 2017, 11:46 am
| Um, $150 to be able to copy headers? Nah, I'll just type them out! |
↧
October 29, 2017, 4:40 am
↧
Please fix and patch ASAP, or I want my money back.
Please indicate availability date or provide a usable workaround ASAP.